Formula Intake
논문 수식은 notation이 아니라 claim의 계약입니다. 수식을 읽을 때는 모양을 외우기보다 어떤 object, distribution, parameter, objective, metric을 고정하는지 확인합니다.
Intake Fields
| Field | Question | Route |
|---|---|---|
| Explanation depth | Should the note use name-only, canonical formula, operational form, claim contract, or derivation depth? | Formula explanation ladder |
| Pattern | Does the equation match a known loss, likelihood, contrastive, generative, graph, coordinate, or metric pattern? | Formula pattern catalog |
| Object type | Is the quantity a scalar, vector, matrix, tensor, graph, coordinate, distribution, or trajectory? | Linear algebra, Tensor shape notation, Geometry |
| Index set | Does the index run over batch, token, node, edge, residue, atom, time, sample, or candidate? | Discrete math and graphs |
| Distribution | Is the expectation over data, model samples, noise, policy rollouts, or test population? | Probability and statistics |
| Objective | Is the formula a loss, likelihood, bound, score, reward, constraint, or metric? | Information and likelihood |
| Constraint | Is the formula a hard feasible set, penalty, barrier, projection, or repair rule? | Constrained optimization |
| Bayesian quantity | Is the formula a prior, likelihood, posterior, MAP estimate, or posterior predictive distribution? | Bayesian inference |
| Objective-metric link | Does the optimized loss support the reported metric and claimed utility? | Objective-metric alignment |
| Derivative | Is the derivative with respect to parameters, inputs, coordinates, time, or latent variables? | Calculus and gradients |
| Curvature | Does the method use Hessian, Fisher, Newton step, curvature, or local quadratic approximation? | Second-order optimization |
| Symmetry | Should the output be invariant or equivariant under permutation, translation, rotation, or reflection? | Geometry and symmetry |
| Numerics | Does implementation require stable softmax, log-sum-exp, precision control, or conditioning checks? | Numerical computing |
| Evidence | Is the reported number a point estimate, confidence interval, paired comparison, or selected checkpoint? | Evaluation math |
| Benchmark score | What aggregation, split, selection rule, and denominator define the reported number? | Benchmark intake |
Rewrite Pattern
For any objective, rewrite the paper equation into this shape when possible:
Then define:
- : sampled unit, such as example, token, node, pair, time, noise, or trajectory.
- : sampling distribution used by the objective.
- : weighting, mask, importance weight, or class balance term.
- : per-unit loss, score, residual, or reward term.
- : optimized parameter set.
This makes hidden assumptions visible: sampling policy, masking policy, class imbalance, time weighting, and whether the objective matches the evaluation metric.
Common Formula Families
| Family | Canonical Question |
|---|---|
| Linear map | What are the input/output shapes, axes, rank, and projection matrices? |
| Attention | How are , , , mask, softmax, head concatenation, and output projection defined? |
| Message passing | What node, edge, neighbor, message, aggregation, and update functions are used? |
| Likelihood | What distribution is modeled, and what observation is conditioned on? |
| Bayesian inference | What is prior, likelihood, posterior, evidence, MAP estimate, or predictive distribution? |
| Contrastive loss | What is the anchor, positive, negative set, similarity, and temperature? |
| Diffusion or flow | What is the state, time variable, noise/score/velocity target, and sampling path? |
| Energy model | What is the energy, score, force, partition term, sampler, or negative process? |
| Constraint | What is hard, soft, projected, repaired, filtered, and counted as invalid? |
| Equivariance | What group acts on the input, and how should the output transform? |
| Metric | What is averaged, over which examples, after which model-selection rule? |
For worked canonical patterns, use Formula pattern catalog.
Explanation Depth
Use Formula explanation ladder before deciding how much math to place in the current note.
| Target | Minimum |
|---|---|
| Korean post | canonical formula with symbols, or operational form for the main method |
| Concept note | operational form with shapes, indices, distribution, and checks |
| Paper note | claim contract connecting objective, estimator, benchmark, and evidence |
| Math note | derivation or assumptions when the formula itself is the topic |
Red Flags
- A metric is treated as a loss without explaining the surrogate.
- A loss is assumed to optimize the reported metric without an alignment argument.
- An expectation omits the sampling distribution.
- A constraint is written as a penalty but described as guaranteed validity.
- Invalid generated samples are filtered before reporting without a denominator.
- A graph or set equation does not state permutation behavior.
- A coordinate model does not state translation or rotation handling.
- A benchmark average hides per-target, per-scaffold, or per-source variation.
- A selected checkpoint is reported as if it were an untouched test estimate.