Computational Biology Boundary
Computational Biology in this site means the object and workflow side of modeling biological and chemical systems. It covers molecular, protein, structure, interaction, and sequence-level modeling, but it does not try to survey all of biology. Broad omics, systems biology, transcriptomics, single-cell analysis, and clinical biology stay out of scope unless a concrete research need appears.
The practical unit is:
If the object, measurement, representation, or claim is vague, the model result is hard to interpret.
Scope
| Area | Use For |
|---|---|
| Computational Biology Scope | route choice and boundary between domain object, AI method, Math, and Agents |
| Objects and Entities | protein, molecule, ligand, pocket, complex, assay, sequence, structure |
| Sequence-based modeling | protein sequence, genome sequence, representation, family or region split |
| Molecular and ligand modeling | small-molecule identity, standardization, fingerprints, graphs, conformers |
| Interaction modeling | target-conditioned activity, affinity, selectivity, pair-level claims |
| Structure-based modeling | protein-ligand geometry, pose, interaction, scoring |
| Docking | receptor/ligand preparation, pose generation, pose quality, ranking |
| Data and evaluation | split units, label semantics, leakage, benchmark contracts |
Core Questions
- What is the biological or chemical object?
- What is the context: target, pocket, assay, condition, organism, or source?
- What representation is used: string, graph, fingerprint, sequence embedding, coordinate set, or complex graph?
- What split unit supports the claim: scaffold, protein family, complex pair, assay, or time?
- What metric answers the actual task rather than a convenient proxy?
Representation Map
| Object | Common Representations | Main Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Molecule / ligand | SMILES, molecular graph, fingerprint, conformer ensemble | identity drift from salt, tautomer, protonation, stereo, or standardization choices |
| Protein | amino-acid sequence, MSA, structure, residue graph, pocket representation | family leakage, residue-index mismatch, missing regions, structure-cleaning artifacts |
| Protein-ligand complex | pocket-ligand coordinates, interaction graph, distance/contact features | template leakage, ligand-defined pocket leakage, symmetry-incorrect pose comparison |
| Assay label | endpoint, unit, threshold, censoring, source, target context | mixing incompatible assays or treating weak labels as clean labels |
| Genome region | sequence window, k-mer counts, variant context, annotation features | coordinate-system mismatch and overbroad omics claims |
Claim Template
A public computational biology claim should be reducible to:
For example, a docking note should not only say that a model performs well. It should say whether the claim is about pose generation, pose plausibility, ranking, affinity prediction, enrichment, or out-of-family generalization.
Boundaries
| Include | Defer |
|---|---|
| structure-based modeling | broad systems biology |
| molecular and ligand modeling | transcriptomics and single-cell analysis |
| sequence-based protein/genome modeling | clinical omics |
| interaction modeling | pathway biology unless a concrete project needs it |
| assay-aware labels and splits | private datasets or unpublished results |